Answers for a calmer
audit workflow.

No. AI-generated drafts require human review. Authorised members of the client team decide what to edit, approve and send to the auditor.

Approval and sending are restricted to authorised client roles. Other team members can help prepare evidence and work through assigned queries without bypassing that review step.

The client team is notified and explicitly accepts or declines the request. Accepting starts the response workflow; the request is not silently progressed by the AI.

Yes. You can select evidence already held in the document vault or upload a new file against the query before the response is approved and sent.

Documents explicitly attached to a query are shown with the final auditor-side workflow. Internal drafts, reviewer notes and unrelated vault documents remain private to the client team.

PDF, CSV, plain-text and common image evidence can be viewed in the product. Files that cannot be safely previewed are delivered as protected downloads.

A control can retain dated completion records and the evidence used for each cycle. A relevant completed control can then be linked to an auditor query without changing the historical record.

It evaluates the controls and evidence recorded in your organisation, identifies specific control or document gaps, and records the scope and limitations of the assessment so the result can be reviewed in context.

No. Readiness scores and recommendations are decision support. Your finance team and professional advisers remain responsible for the underlying records, controls and audit conclusions.